“But can’t you build much bigger things this way?”
Short answer: you can build something. But building a platform is a very different problem.
Vibe coding is incredibly effective for:
- Solving local, well-defined problems
- Prototyping ideas quickly
- Automating small workflows
- Testing assumptions fast
In those cases, speed matters more than structure.
But as the scope grows, software stops being a coding problem and becomes a systems problem.
Platforms introduce a different level of complexity:
- Shared data models
- Cross-module dependencies
- Permissions and security
- Versioning and backward compatibility
- Ownership and long-term maintenance
This is where things change.
It’s no longer about “does it work?” It’s about “can this survive?”
Survive scale. Survive change. Survive people leaving the team.
That’s also where “vibes” start to break.
You cannot use vibe coding to create an enterprise platform from scratch.
But you can use vibe coding to build that platform much faster — when it’s applied in the right layers, with the right boundaries.
Because platforms don’t fail when features don’t work. They fail when:
- Knowledge lives only in prompts or people’s heads
- Decisions aren’t documented
- Ownership is unclear
- Local optimizations create global debt
This doesn’t make vibe coding useless. It just defines where it belongs.
Vibe coding is powerful at the edges:
- Custom workflows
- Internal tools
- Experiments
- Customer-specific extensions
But the core of a platform — data, security, architecture, scalability — requires deliberate design and discipline.
You can’t build a platform on vibes alone.
The real opportunity is not choosing between vibe coding and platforms. It’s knowing which problems deserve which approach.